Peer Review Policy

1. Purpose:

"Contemporary Research Review for Social Work" (CRRSW) utilizes a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality, originality, and relevance of published research. This policy outlines the expectations for both reviewers and authors to ensure a fair and transparent review process.

2. Selection of Reviewers:

• Reviewers are chosen based on their expertise in the specific area of research submitted.
• The editorial board maintains a pool of qualified reviewers with diverse backgrounds and experiences.
• Reviewers are not affiliated with the author(s) or their institution to avoid any potential bias.

3. Review Process:

• All manuscripts submitted to CRRSW undergo a double-blind peer review process.
• Each manuscript is sent to two independent reviewers who provide written feedback on the following aspects:
  • Originality and significance of the research question
  • Soundness of the research methodology
  • Clarity and accuracy of the data analysis
  • Strength of the conclusions and implications for social work practice and policy
  • Overall quality of the writing and presentation
• Reviewers are expected to provide constructive and specific feedback that helps authors improve their work.
• Authors are given the opportunity to respond to reviewers' comments and revise their manuscripts based on the feedback.
• The final decision on publication is made by the editor-in-chief based on the reviewers' recommendations and the author's response.

4. Reviewer Responsibilities:

• Reviewers are expected to:
  • Maintain the confidentiality of the review process.
  • Provide fair and objective feedback based on their expertise.
  • Be respectful of the author(s) and their work.
  • Declare any potential conflicts of interest before accepting a review assignment.
  • Submit their reviews promptly within the designated timeframe.
• Reviewers should avoid:
  • Plagiarism or copying from the submitted manuscript.
  • Making personal attacks or discriminatory comments.
  • Using the review process for self-promotion or to advance their own research agenda.

5. Author Responsibilities:

• Authors are expected to:
  • Submit original and unpublished research that adheres to the journal's guidelines.
  • Respond to reviewers' comments promptly and professionally.
  • Address reviewers' concerns and make revisions as necessary.
  • Disclose any potential conflicts of interest.
  • Acknowledge the contributions of reviewers in the published manuscript.